The Informers (2009)
Amber Heard, Austin Nichols, Billy Bob Thornton
Focusing on the Los Angeles of the early 1980s, "The Informers" balances a vast array of characters that represent both the top of the heap (a Hollywood dream merchant, a dissolute rock star, an aging newscaster) and the bottom (a voyeuristic doorman, an amoral ex-con). Connecting all these intertwi... (read more) Focusing on the Los Angeles of the early 1980s, "The Informers" balances a vast array of characters that represent both the top of the heap (a Hollywood dream merchant, a dissolute rock star, an aging newscaster) and the bottom (a voyeuristic doorman, an amoral ex-con). Connecting all these intertwining strands are the quintessential Brett Easton Ellis protagonists--a group of beautiful, blonde young men and women who sleep all day and party all night, doing drugs--and one another--with abandon, never realizing that they are dancing on the edge of a volcano.
Flixster Users
Critics
R, 1 hr. 38 min.
Directed by:
Gregor Jordan
Release Date: Apr 24, 2009
DVD Release Date: Aug 25, 2009
Your Rating
Your Friends' Ratings
No recent reviews.
Flixster User Reviews
The Informers really is an unusual kind of terrible, but there is actually a very real possibility that it is a misunderstood work of unparalleled directorial ingenuity. The off-kilter overdubbing, the soft focus camerawork, the trite youth-gone-wild... (read more) The Informers really is an unusual kind of terrible, but there is actually a very real possibility that it is a misunderstood work of unparalleled directorial ingenuity. The off-kilter overdubbing, the soft focus camerawork, the trite youth-gone-wild bullshit dialogue, the nihilistic soft-core group sex - its all exactly like a DTV Zalman King production, and nothing quite sums up the rank, dilapidated sleaziness of the early 1980s than a DTV Zalman King. If Gregor Jordan's career ends up warranting serious critical reappraisals in the future, then this is going to be the gleaming, once-misinterpreted jewel in some chancer's festival retrospective.
But from here, its just appalling. The good actors involved are coasting (Billy Bob Thornton in particular looks as if he's performing from the vantage point of a prozac coma) and the bad actors are left to use their questionable skills to turn every other scene into full-tilt soap opera. The screenplay (co-authored, surprisingly, by Brett Easton Ellis himself) is completely unaware of itself, and so tiresomely arch and condescending that it feels, again, like a product of the 1980's rather than some kind of commentary of it.
Reeling off a plot synopsis would be beyond pointless, as it consists of little more than a bunch of unconnected, uninteresting things happening to some deeply unlikeable people. Everyone appears to be operating under the assumption that this is a satire, but the funniest thing about it is the sheer inappropriateness of the supposedly suckerpunch coda. No prizes.
American Psycho aside, if you want a to see Ellis' rather one-note universe rendered shrewdly onscreen, you should really check out Roger Avary's severely underrated Rules Of Attraction.
Eh, wasn't a fan. The film basically explores the excess of 1980's LA with a narrative that connects all the characters to each other in some way. The real strange part was the Rourke/Renfro storyline. Besides maybe Renfro wanting to be one of the pr... (read more) Eh, wasn't a fan. The film basically explores the excess of 1980's LA with a narrative that connects all the characters to each other in some way. The real strange part was the Rourke/Renfro storyline. Besides maybe Renfro wanting to be one of the privileged, it was completely irrelevant in regards to the other stories. The problem with these films is that the characters are hard to get into because they are shallow and non-existent in their humanity, but then again that's the point the movie is trying to make. Just underwhelmed really.
Bret Easton Elllis adapting his own stories for screen was not such a good idea after all. The movie attempts to recreate the blankness of the fiction but never gets to the point when we care or bother to ask why we actually don't care for these char... (read more) Bret Easton Elllis adapting his own stories for screen was not such a good idea after all. The movie attempts to recreate the blankness of the fiction but never gets to the point when we care or bother to ask why we actually don't care for these characters. There are some good-looking people having lots of empty sex here. Good for them - at least they can escape boredom for a brief moment. People watching this movie can't.
Decent script, amazing cast, nice camerawork. What could go wrong? ah, yes, a horrible director. Except from a few watchable moments, this is a prime example of extreme potential turning to dust. At least it put me to sleep on the airplane :)
Four words to describe this movie.......THIS MOVIE WAS CRAP!! What was Billy Bob, Wynona Rider, and Kim Bassinger thinking??? TOO MUCH INTERTWINING!!!! Gross.....
This movie was only interesting to me because it was set in the early '80s which was when I was a late teen and I was hoping to see Mickey Rourke do something cool in it. I was wrong. It's everything the critics say it is and less. I should have e... (read more) This movie was only interesting to me because it was set in the early '80s which was when I was a late teen and I was hoping to see Mickey Rourke do something cool in it. I was wrong. It's everything the critics say it is and less. I should have expected that it would be terribly depressing based on the fact that it's based on a Bret Easton Ellis novel.
Billy Bob Thornton was so creepy in it (and I don't think he was supposed to be!) that he gave me the heebie-jeebies. I just felt bad for Kim Basinger and thought, "Well, she must have been desperate to make some cash in order to agree to be in this crap!" This film can only be memorable for being the last one that poor, troubled Brad Renfro ever did. He was quite good in it too.
A very insubstantial movie. Shame, considering how good 80s music is. The singer reminds me of Simon Le Bon.
Only wanted to see it cuz Mickey Rourke is the man and it seemed like a sleezy 80 movie.... Which is pretty much was, It was okay, it was thrown together with no real flow to it... overall ahh didnt hate it but like love it, it was okay
I had no problem with the actors, but I did have problems with everything else. No character was emotional or emotionally interesting, the pace was low, the story had no ambition and was clearly going nowhere, and dialogues were often uninspired. Who... (read more) I had no problem with the actors, but I did have problems with everything else. No character was emotional or emotionally interesting, the pace was low, the story had no ambition and was clearly going nowhere, and dialogues were often uninspired. Whoever made this had something bigger in mind.
Critic Reviews
Bret Easton Ellis pens a mean tale, in all adjectival senses. His prose is artfully maleficent; he is a laid-back Severus Snape of the sex-and-drugs generation. You need a smarter directing hand, though, than Gregor Jordan's.full review
There seems to be no point to this derivative Bret Easton Ellis retro-wallow. It's all sex, drugs, rock 'n roll and boredom - with the emphasis on boredom.full review
The performances run the gamut from twitchy to catatonic, and the stoned stiffness of the actors seems to have less to do with the affectlessness of the characters than with their own confusion.full review
Has an air of detachment and sadness, enhanced by the movie's being set a full quarter century ago. Like new cars in an old movie, these people may glow with youth, but we watch them in full awareness of the beaters and wrecks they'll become.full review
The movie has more dead scenes than a Monday night in Magnitogorsk.full review
Do some blow. Curse humanity. Convert to nilhilism. Reread American Psycho. But don't for the love of God and cinema see The Informers.full review
TMZ with phony gravitas. Ellis' stories had more oomph before drug-crazed screwups like Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan and Amy Winehouse became the center of the Internet news cycle.full review
Ellis' book, though a grim read, had a satirical edge to it that made it darkly enjoyable; the movie is simply dark and dull. And vampireless, more's the pity.full review
The piece had better have something fresh to say. The Informers doesn't, nor does it seem to want to.full review
The dialogue is laughable. Lines are spoken so languidly that the actors seem bored. Shattering revelations are delivered in the same monotone as casual patter.full review
Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com
Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)
Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)
All Rotten Tomatoes content is used under license from Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten Tomatoes, Certified Fresh, and the Tomatometer are the trademarks of Incfusion Corporation, d/b/a Rotten Tomatoes, a subsidiary of IGN Entertainment, Inc.
Cast
More Like This
No recent suggestions.
The Informers Videos
Bookmark This App
Make it easy to check out new movies! Click +Bookmark Movies at the bottom of your screen.
- Get Flixster
- iPhone (free!)
- Myspace
- Flixster.com
- iGoogle
- Settings
- Profile Settings
- My Account
- Help

















