Rules of Engagement (2000)
Tommy Lee Jones, Samuel L. Jackson, Nicky Katt
Director William Friedkin knows a thing or two about staging harrowing action sequences, and if you don't believe that, you've never seen The French Connection or To Live and Die in L.A. He comes through niftily in this film as well, with an opening Vietnam battle sequence that sets the stage for th... (read more) Director William Friedkin knows a thing or two about staging harrowing action sequences, and if you don't believe that, you've never seen The French Connection or To Live and Die in L.A. He comes through niftily in this film as well, with an opening Vietnam battle sequence that sets the stage for the rest of the story, and then with the central moment in the film: a rescue mission involving Marines extricating the American ambassador from an embassy surrounded by hostile protesters in Yemen. Unfortunately, Friedkin can't do much about the implausible plot that follows, in which the Marine commander, played by the always-terrific Samuel L. Jackson, is accused of slaughtering innocent civilians (who actually were shooting at him and his men). He must rely on an old Marine buddy--a lawyer played by Tommy Lee Jones--to get him through the jury-rigged court martial. But the central premise--that an evil presidential aide would perjure himself and destroy evidence simply to maintain good relations with U.S. allies in the Middle East, rather than defending a highly decorated Marine colonel who risked his life--is inevitably hard to swallow. And the ending is even flimsier. --Marshall Fine
Flixster Users
Critics
R, 127 min.
Directed by:
William Friedkin
Release Date: Apr 07, 2000
DVD Release Date: Oct 10, 2000
Your Rating
Your Friends' Ratings
No recent reviews.
Flixster User Reviews
A great movie. Simply put..
But it depends do you like your war films? Do you like court proceedings? Do you like mystery?
If you've answered yes to 2 or more of the uestions above...watch it!
If not then avoid..or watch...up to you!
I didn't realize this movie was almost ten years old. Yikes! I had never heard of it, so I gave it a try, mostly because of the all star cast. Well, the action sequences were very poorly directed a la the sudden slow motion death sequences (which rem... (read more) I didn't realize this movie was almost ten years old. Yikes! I had never heard of it, so I gave it a try, mostly because of the all star cast. Well, the action sequences were very poorly directed a la the sudden slow motion death sequences (which reminds the audience that they're watching a movie). However, I suspected this would all be cleared up once we got into the "court room" phase of the movie... and I was right. The director couldn't shoot an action sequence to save his life, but did a good job with the remainder of the film (which consisted of non-action scenes). I was worried that there was going to be some psuedo-Hollywood twist on the film's message and was pleasantly surprised that it didn't take that stance either. I also wasn't sure if it was a true story going on, but apparently it was at least based on a true story. Kudos to Tommy Lee Jones who was his typically outstanding self. Oh and as usual, I found a hole in the story. Most of the case was built around the fact that there wasn't video of terrorists shooting at the front of the US Embassy in Kenya. But there was an audio tape of the transmissions which would've displayed to the jury just how heavy the artillery was coming into the Marines atop the building. I couldn't believe Tommy Lee Jones' character didn't think of it... Oh well, maybe it was in the director's cut.
A pre-9/11 American movie about American relationships with Arabic countries. Could be interesting. Or maybe not...
I was not expecting too much of this movie about Americans at war. Considering the director and the cast, I had a look at it. How is ... (read more) A pre-9/11 American movie about American relationships with Arabic countries. Could be interesting. Or maybe not...
I was not expecting too much of this movie about Americans at war. Considering the director and the cast, I had a look at it. How is it possible that a guy who did The French Connection and The Exorcist directed such a simplistic movie ?
The general intention of the movie is unclear to me. The justification of the acts of the Colonel played by Samuel L. Jackson is to say the least highly unethical. I cannot believe that this kind of words or actions could be treated like this in an American military court.
Good : the acting of Samuel L. Jackson and Tommy Lee Jones is reasonable (but they do not need to force their talent). The action scenes in Yemen are entertaining.
Bad : the acting of Guy Pearce (so far from Memento that was done at the same period), Ben Kingsley (so far from Gandhi or Schindler's List), Bruce Greemwood or Anne Archer is not convincing. A bit of a waste of talent. The second part of the movie is far less interesting than the first.
But, in my opinion, the worse is the obvious underlying that Arabic people are all bad and that American people are all good. It makes the movie barely watchable.
Disappointing and very questionable.
Tommy Lee 'BOSS' Jones ('In the Valley of Elah') x Samuel Jackson ('Home of the Brave', 'Basic'), and Guy Pearce... more of court battle.
A fairly standard courtroom drama is rendered bracing only thanks to the depiction of action on two separate battlefields. When viewed in the context of combat, Jackson's character comes off as a consummate professional, but in day-to-day life, he ha... (read more) A fairly standard courtroom drama is rendered bracing only thanks to the depiction of action on two separate battlefields. When viewed in the context of combat, Jackson's character comes off as a consummate professional, but in day-to-day life, he has become unhinged. The conflict between these two separate lives is should be the central theme of the film, but it too frequently becomes secondary to a government cover-up that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. When paired with a fairly one-dimensional portrayal of the people of Yemen (who are clearly supposed to stand in for a wrongfully pissed middle east), the movie loses water before it can build steam. Those interested in courtroom dramas will have plenty to chew on as the primary actors bring the stand to life and Friedkin's inspired directing never lets any visual become boring.
Critic Reviews
At the end we have a film that attacks its central issue from all sides and has a collision in the middle.full review
At the end we have a film that attacks its central issue from all sides and has a collision in the middle.full review
Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com
Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)
Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)
All Rotten Tomatoes content is used under license from Rotten Tomatoes. Rotten Tomatoes, Certified Fresh, and the Tomatometer are the trademarks of Incfusion Corporation, d/b/a Rotten Tomatoes, a subsidiary of IGN Entertainment, Inc.
Bookmark This App
Make it easy to check out new movies! Click +Bookmark Movies at the bottom of your screen.
- Get Flixster
- iPhone (free!)
- Myspace
- Flixster.com
- iGoogle
- Settings
- Profile Settings
- My Account
- Help
- Privacy Policy






