Pretty boring, but the last few minutes are silly. It is kinda fun to laugh at the bad 3-D effects though, but there aren't nearly enough to warrant too much fun. Also like half the movie is out of focus.

aside from maybe 2 sequences, this film is tame tame tame! Even less scary than the original, which I didn't think was possible.

feeling more like a Poltergiest rip off than an Amityville movie, the scares are all recyled and watered down (speaki... (read more) aside from maybe 2 sequences, this film is tame tame tame! Even less scary than the original, which I didn't think was possible.

feeling more like a Poltergiest rip off than an Amityville movie, the scares are all recyled and watered down (speaking of water, the film gets a point for being the only one in the series at the time to make use of the fact the house has a boatyard, but misses the opportunity to make it creepy).

To Amityville fans who thought the second film was a perverse gross-out feel bad time, part 3 will likely feel like a slight return to form, albeit a weak one. But to any serious horrorfile, Amityville 3 holds nothing of interest.

Third entry in the Amityville series. I didn't get the pleasure of seeing it in 3-D, I saw the un3d version : Amityville: The Demon. It's bad, really really bad. Not worth your time. Stick to the first two and the remake.

I just saw this movie, and have already forgotten it. That's what this movie is - forgettable. However, it does solidify my belief that big-time actors and actresses all get their start in horror movies, oftentimes really terrible ones.

Amityville 3D 3/10 Entertaining in it's own right, but nowhere near the violence/creepiness of the first two Amityville movies. You know why because its fricken PG. Check it out if your into the 3-D shit but otherwise skip it.

Dude, I was scared. The ending was lame, but threw the whole movie was screaming. I even spilt a whole bowl of popcorn at one scene.

unintentionally hilarious third installment of a DOA franchise. Anyone else notice the lead actor resembles George Dubya Bush?

In the early 1980s (specifically 1982 to 1983 or so) it seemed every franchise that reached #3 felt the need to shoot that particular entry in 3D. And, of course, they all had the same problem once they hit home video -- they were released in lousy ... (read more) In the early 1980s (specifically 1982 to 1983 or so) it seemed every franchise that reached #3 felt the need to shoot that particular entry in 3D. And, of course, they all had the same problem once they hit home video -- they were released in lousy 2D versions. AMITYVILLE 3 is no exception. This time, the story takes a bit of an interesting turn in that its set in reality and Tony Roberts plays a reporter who moves into the house in an attempt to squash the rumors of its evil past. Though some of the effects appear hokey, this movie does work on a few different levels. Oh, and it’s got a young Meg Ryan in it, too....which I know some of you guys out there will enjoy, right? See it.

A fantastically dull installment in the Amityville saga, though watching some of the attempts at utilizing the 3-D format can be amusing. Also, Meg Ryan spews some positively hilarious dialogue in one of her very first film roles!