Forgot your password?
LivingSocial
  • books
  • albums
  • movies
  • restaurants
  • games
  • beer
  • tv shows
  • Home
  • Profile
  • Manage
  • Recommendations
  • Friends
  • Leaders
  • Invite
  • Help
Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion of American Democracy by Charlie Savage

Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion of American Democracy

Charlie Savage

Charlie Savage
  • You rated 0/5 Stars.
  • Community 4/5 Stars.
  • 0.5/5.0
  • 1/5
  • 1.5/5.0
  • 2/5
  • 2.5/5.0
  • 3/5
  • 3.5/5.0
  • 4/5
  • 4.5/5.0
  • 5/5
clear rating

In 1789, the Founding Fathers came up with a system of checks and balances to keep kingly powers out of the hands of American presidents. But in the 1970s and '80s, a faction of Republican loyalists, outraged by the fall of the imperial presidency after Watergate and the Vietnam War, abandoned conservatives' traditional suspicion of concentrated government power. These men hatched a plot that would allow the White House to return to, or even surpass, the virtually unchecked powers that Richar... (show more)

In 1789, the Founding Fathers came up with a system of checks and balances to keep kingly powers out of the hands of American presidents. But in the 1970s and '80s, a faction of Republican loyalists, outraged by the fall of the imperial presidency after Watergate and the Vietnam War, abandoned conservatives' traditional suspicion of concentrated government power. These men hatched a plot that would allow the White House to return to, or even surpass, the virtually unchecked powers that Richard Nixon had briefly tried to wield. Congress would be defanged, and the commander-in-chief would be able to assert a unilateral dominance both at home and abroad. Today, this plot is coming to fruition. As Takeover reveals, the Bush-Cheney administration has succeeded in seizing vast powers for the presidency by throwing off many of the restraints placed upon it by Congress, the courts, and the Constitution. This timely book unveils the secret machinations behind the headlines, explaining the links between warrantless wiretapping and the President Bush's Supreme Court nominees, between the torture debate and the secrecy surrounding Vice President Cheney's energy task force, and between the "faith-based initiative" and the holding of US citizens without trial as "enemy combatants." It tells, for the first time, the full story of a hidden agenda three decades in the making, laying out how a group of true believers set out to establish monarchical executive powers that, in the words of one conservative critic, "will lie around like a loaded weapon" ready to be picked up by any future president.

Brilliantly reported and deftly told, Takeover is a searing investigation into how the constitutional balance of our democracy is in danger of being permanently altered. For anyone who cares about America's past, present, and future, it is essential reading.

(show less)

Reviews (27)

Sort: Usefulness | Date
You must login/signup to post a comment. Learn more here.
Alberto
no yes
Alberto Luperon, 2 days ago

Quote-leftThis was something; it will feed any interest in constitutional law with its concise coverage of how the Bush Administration punched out checks and balances. This is only a survey, however, but the bibliography will lead the interested to deeper study. This book also covers the machinery of federal bureaucracy. Those with an interest of the precise nature of political decisions, and how business and government interact (only touched upon lightly in regard to 9/11 and Cheney's Energy Task Force) need to look elsewhere.

But I loved this book.Quote-right

Jedidiah
no yes
Jedidiah Abdul Muhib Palosaari, 17 days ago

Quote-leftHorrible. Disgusting. I was filled with repulsion to the depths of my being, in reading this book.

Savage makes an exquisite case. He goes through, point by point, in excellently written prose, showing all the ways that Bush and Cheney have subverted the constitution. He doesn't do this just referring to obscure aspects. He doesn't just present opinions. He looks at the core of the constitution, at the Separation of Powers, and how Bush Cheney et.al. have worked to remove that from the basis of our country. Savage gives a huge amount of meticulous evidence, albeit written in a style that makes it feel like a story.

But it is a story worthy of the great Shakespearean or Greek tragedies. This is not a case where Cheney made a mistake, or misunderstood something. He has been working since his time under Nixon to expand the power of the President. It's not just a case where there's a disagreement on the interpretation of the constitution. He truly believes that Congress should have no oversight over the President, that the President should make laws, and that this was what the Founding Fathers intended. Far worse, over the last seven years, he's enacted his beliefs, so that they are now the custom of the land.

And then it got worse. This belief on the independence of the President, the "Unitary Presidential Theory", is believed by only a small minority of scholars. Most think it only slightly better than the gift your dog gives you when you take it on a walk. (I'm sorry. That was unfair. Dogs leave behind far higher quality.) But now, two Supreme Court Justices were found to believe this idea as well. So Busheney have worked to undermine the future of our country as well, inserting their viscous beliefs into the very top of our court system, that they might slowly win others to their cult of power.

A friend counseled me not to read this book, for it would just make me angry. He was right. But I think we need to be aware of what's going on. Where we once had a country built on the rule of law, with at the time the finest document devoted to freedom and equality in history, we now have only tattered cloth and shattered dreams. We have two men ruling us, devoted to power and control, with no compassion within them. And we have decades ahead of us, to work to correct the destruction they have wrought on our country and the world. I do not believe in my life I have seen a greater example of what it means to be a traitor. If you can stomach it, read this book, to see the work ahead of us, and the shame we now collectively own. For I do not believe in my life I will see us truly healed from these past seven years.Quote-right

Rick
no yes
Rick Elmore, 19 days ago

Quote-leftAn excellent look at the expansion of executive power under Bush-Cheney. However, it is also a nice history of executive power since Nixon, and a good introduction to the development of the Unified Executive Theory. It will make you mad, and it should scare you.Quote-right

Michael
no yes
Michael Sclafani, about 1 month ago

Quote-leftExcellent, really excellent. He manages to take an issue and lay out the facts in a way that is rather hard to dispute. Obviously, he has his opinion, and occasionally you'll see it get the best of him, but for the most part, this book just lays out Cheney and the notion of the Unitary Executive System. If you support the idea, you'll read this and say "so?" If you support any concept of Checks and Balances, this book will document a host of ideas that will disturb you greatly.Quote-right

Jameson
no yes
Jameson Penn, about 1 month ago

Quote-leftFantastic- and by fantastic I mean I was fuming the entire time I read this. Savage has a remarkable knack for digging beneath the press releases and mainstream headlines to deliver an accurate assessment of the current state of our government. The checks and balances we grew up learning about in Civics class are dead.Quote-right

Liz
no yes
Liz Scott, 3 months ago

Quote-leftInteresting read, concentrates on the rise of executive power, through the Bush/Cheney administration. Although the book concentrates on the Bush administration, he brings in examples from previous presidents when dealing with presidential power. Definitely worth reading.Quote-right

David
no yes
Facebook User, 4 months ago

Quote-leftThe story that this Pulitzer-winning author unpacks is mind-boggling and sickening. It reveals how the Bush-Cheney administration have systematically insulated the Executive Branch from due process, oversight, checks and balances, and the rule of law. And they have done it all by mendaciously asserting and boldly implementing two legal theories that are viewed as dubious and ill-founded by the vast majority of the legal community.
On the one-hand there is the idea of the "Unitary Executive". This theory maintains that the executive branch, and in particular its chief executive the President, has an exclusive remit over all powers that the Constitution grants it. In other words, the President is the sole and unchallengable arbiter of all executive powers and he can not be restrained, checked, or balanced in his judgement and performance of these powers by either the Judicial or Executive Branch.
This would be bad enough. But the Bush-Cheney administration has also maintained the most extreme position on the idea of the President's inherent powers. This crux of this position is that the President holds power that the constitution does NOT specifically enumerate, but that inherently acrue to him with his/her Constitutional role of Commander-in-Chief and as head of the Executive Branch.
Taken together these ideas remove constraints upon the actions of the Executive and grant the President almost logically unlimited power to do what he or she sees fit, particularly in areas that can be construed as affecting national security in any way.

Both of these theories, in substance and spirit, contradict the plain meaning of the Constitution and the moral, intellectual, and philosophical ethos of the Founding Fathers who opposed nothing more in government that unchecked and unrestrained executive power.

Nevertheless, the Bush-Cheney administration have been remarkably successful in putting these combined theories into action, establishing them in precedents, AND - most stunningly - shielding them from rigorous judicial scrutiny with ever more audacious tactics.

Despite the views of the administration that their position was in fact the correct reading of the Constitution and therefore lawful, it has never been upfront with the American people about its theories and the way it has methodically sought to permanently alter and undermine the separation of powers and the traditionally understood Republican ideals of the American system of government. Elected and appointed officials have duplicitously minced their words when speaking in public whilst aggressively acting toward their goals in private.

Yet another astonishing aspect of all this is that the intellectual and bureaucratic energy behind this bold agenda came not from the President, but from Vice-President Dick Cheney and his most important aide David Addington.

This is a startling and frightening book that emerges from a highly-respected journalist; this is is not a partisan attack. Most sadly of all, as yet there is no sign yet that the Candidates for the office of the Presidency have grasped the scope of this takeover. Nor have they appreciated the urgency of the need that it begins to be dismantled before it is thoroughly enshrined in practice and precedence. This needs to be done for the sake of the republic, its most fundamental values, and the men and women from across the world who rely on that Great Republic and its values to cherish and safeguard their most basic human dignity.

Read this book. And then lend it to someone else.Quote-right

Jeff
no yes
Jeff Olsen, 4 months ago

Quote-leftEvery American should read this book, if only to realize the full extent of what we and our lawmakers have allowed the presidency to become. Republican or Democrat, the changes to the presidency over the past 8 years have been dramatic and sweeping, and they have grave implications for the future of this country. Savage tries hard not to come across as biased, pointing out things Democratic presidents have done to expand presidential power, but there's no denying that the focus of this book is on the Bush administration. For the most part, Savage avoids making judgments about whether or not expansion of power is good or bad, but the tone is hardly approving....Quote-right

Maggie
no yes
Maggie Barbeau, 5 months ago

Quote-leftReally Interesting but a lot of information at once
you read a page but then after you inish you ave to go back and read it again because you really weren't paying attention
but there were some cool facts
and it made me not hate republicans so much, just the bush administrationQuote-right

Justin
no yes
Justin Humbert, 6 months ago

Quote-leftGreat read on our current presidency, and exposes truths every American needs to know on how our democracy should be working.Quote-right

Displaying 1 - 10 of 27Previous1 2 3Next

Image Gallery (1)

51o2mxe3g2l

Your Interest




Your Ownership





Featured Book sponsored

Plum Spooky by Janet Evanovich

Plum Spooky

by Janet Evanovich

Turn on all the lights and check under your bed. Things are about to get spooky in Trenton, New Jersey. According to legend, the Jersey Devil prowls the Pine Barrens and soars above the treetops in the dark of night. As eerie as this might seem, there are things in the Barrens that are even more frightening and dangerous. And there are monkeys. Lots of monkeys. more

Discussions (0)

Start new topic
Post the first discussion
Netflix, Inc.

People (244)

Ian
Newsha
Ray
Russ
Alistair
Michael
Kory
Akin
Megan
Katarina
Leighcandice
Eric
Just
Peter
David
Nicole
Andrew
Todd
Nick
W.
Matthew
Steve
Robert
Mike
Bree
Matthew
Robert
Molly
Carrie
Stefan
Bill
Anna
Harleen
Jessica
Tom
Ashley
Amy
Jan
John
Steve
Philip
Kristin
Stephen
Elisabeth
Skyler
Adnan
Jeff
Maggie
Jason
Graham
Tammy
Clay
Louis
Claes
Chris
Dennis
Roberto-Hussein
Madeline
Sam
Shaun

Lists (2)

PoliticalPolitics ..
  • LivingSocial
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Press
  • Disclaimer
Copyright ©2009 LivingSocial. All rights reserved.
 
Page built by Visual BookshelfContact Report    
  • Login
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Developers
  • Jobs
  • Terms
  • Find Friends
  • Privacy
  • Help