Reading this book again at 40 (I first read it when I was 16) was a completely revelatory experience. The two things that I remembered the most--t... (show more)
Jane Eyre
Jane Eyre (1847) has enjoyed huge popularity since first publication, and its success owes much to its exceptional emotional power. Jane Eyre, a penniless orphan, is engaged as governess at Thornfield Hall by the mysterious Mr Rochester. Her integrity and independence are tested to the limit
as their love for each other grows, and the secrets of Mr Rochester's past are revealed. A brilliant new edition of this flagship of Victorian fiction, this book includes a new introduction and revised... (show more)
Jane Eyre (1847) has enjoyed huge popularity since first publication, and its success owes much to its exceptional emotional power. Jane Eyre, a penniless orphan, is engaged as governess at Thornfield Hall by the mysterious Mr Rochester. Her integrity and independence are tested to the limit
as their love for each other grows, and the secrets of Mr Rochester's past are revealed. A brilliant new edition of this flagship of Victorian fiction, this book includes a new introduction and revised notes from one of the foremost Bronte scholars. This text is based on the definitive Clarendon
edition, based on the original editions of Bronte's great work. (show less)
Related Media
Photo Gallery
Similar Books
You might like these
Reviews (See all 9,813) Write a reviewfor this
It's a hit!
No, it's a flop!
Un buen libro para pasar las noches, una escritura fina y una historia interesante, pero no realmente nada espléndido. Demasiado "ejemplo de moral ... (show more)
Un buen libro para pasar las noches, una escritura fina y una historia interesante, pero no realmente nada espléndido. Demasiado "ejemplo de moral victoriana" para alguien que nada quiere saber de ella en ninguna forma y de ninguna manera. En realidad, es seguro que las obras de Charlotte Bronte son muy inferiores a la de su hermana Emily; el gran reconocimiento que se ganó estaba muy bien justificado en tanto en cuanto es un libro moral y nada innovador por carecer de toda divergencia y menos aun subversión que contraríen las exigencias dogmáticas del público. Por lo demás, a mi decir, una vez se lee una obra de Charlotte se conoce la sustancia de las demás: Una mujer pudorosa no del todo como las de su tiempo sólo por una simpleza menor y un hombre amargo y hasta cierto punto escandaloso que extravía este inicial atractivo cuando se disuelve en las enfermizas instancias de ella de rectitud y decencia. Ciertamente, si soslayamos su hastiante moralidad, la lectura no es desagradable, y es un libro hasta cierto punto atractivo y representativo de su época. (show less)
More Reviews
-
When Jane Eyre and Rochester have their first intimate conversation in the library and he pulls back his hair revealing a massive, virile forehead and says "Criticize me!" I get a massive lit-nerd girl boner
Mmmm. Reader, I married him.Already read
-
I've probably read Jane Eyre 10 times, and each time I appreciate something new. Mostly I love that she doesn't "roll over." From the beginning, when her cousin John attacks her, she fights back. Not maliciously, but with a full sense of her own value and an absolute refusal to accept mistreatment as her due. While remaining true to her values, she insists upon making only choices that are in line with her sense of self. At times she pities herself, but much more often she chooses t... (show more)
I've probably read Jane Eyre 10 times, and each time I appreciate something new. Mostly I love that she doesn't "roll over." From the beginning, when her cousin John attacks her, she fights back. Not maliciously, but with a full sense of her own value and an absolute refusal to accept mistreatment as her due. While remaining true to her values, she insists upon making only choices that are in line with her sense of self. At times she pities herself, but much more often she chooses to act.
In one of my favorite scenes in the book, she goes out in search of her then-financé Mr. Rochester, in the pouring rain, rather than waiting at home by the fire. She doesn't fall ill and fight a dangerous fever as a result (as so many heroines of the day might have done). Instead, she rides home with him on his horse, and is comforted by his presence.
It's been said before (many times!), but Jane is one of the first truly feminist characters in English literature. What is less talked about is her (and Charlotte Bronté's) refusal to accept the oppressive religious attitudes of her day. Jane utters one of my favorite lines in all of fiction when asked by the Reverend Brockelhurst what she must do to avoid hell: "I must keep well and not die." I want to cheer every time I read it. Sometimes, I confess, I do cheer - actually cheer. I once startled my dog out of a sound sleep.
It is my secret ambition to write a screenplay for this novel that actually gets Jane RIGHT. Who knows, someday maybe I will. (show less)
Already read
- See all reviews
Conversations
Please log in to join the conversation
-
Re-reading so I can teach it in my Insane Characters in Literature course next semester.
Facebook-gebruiker 2 days ago -
Mr. Rochester vs. Mr. Darcy
(Question) If you could choose which one you could have, either as a friend/boyfriend/husband, which one would it be? Mr. Rochester (Jane Eyre) or Mr. Darcy (Pride and Prejudice)?
(My answer) Personally, I would choose Mr. Rochester as a husband. He is passionate and loyal. He is also flawed.
Mr. Darcy is too perfect. He's tall, dark, handsome, and rich. The perfect man. I know that people say he isn't perfect because he is prideful. But all that goes away in the end and he is perfect by the end of the story. Who wants to live up to perfection? Elizabeth was the only one who would suit him because she is the perfect female character as well.
I like that Mr. Rochester is imperfect. At the end, he is poor and disfigured. He may have tried to marry Jane under wrong ideas, but he was madly in love with her and had been miserable till she came along. He loved her even though she was considered plain. I'd much rather have an imperfect man who is madly in love with me, than have a perfect man who is a little too perfect.
Delaney Johnson about 1 year ago -
Wuthering Heights vs. Jane Eyre?
Fact: Wuthering Heights is far superior!
Myrianne Jones about 1 year ago -
I just feel like this story has so much more depth than Pride and Prejudice. It's hard to explain, but I feel like this could really happen...and the other is obviously not real. I don't know, maybe it's the way it is written. it's possible. Fabulous book.
Alisha N. Warmbier about 1 month ago -
Just finished it for my first time, aged 30, and previously knew nothing about it. Thought it was fantastic. It was like a language buffet where each sentence was one of your favourite foods.
Michael Nicholls about 1 month ago -
Jane Eyre's the best!
This one has been at the top of my list for 40 years - I'm almost ready for my 10th reading and every time I read it it improves again!
Margaret Baird O'Dea about 1 year ago -
-
Patrick McGrath
Are there any other Patrick McGrath fans out there? I realize that he is certainly not for everyone.... I enjoyed "Spider" and "Asylum" but was not thrilled with "Port Mungo" or "Trauma". "Trauma" just seemed a little weak and mainstream for him. I thought "Martha Peake" was pretty awful, in more ways than one and I enjoy historical fiction. What does eveyone think of some of his others, i.e. "Dr. Haggard's Disease" or "The Grotesteque"?
Leslie Dann about 1 year ago
Lists
This book has been added to these lists:
More Stuff
About Us
LivingSocial.com is a social discovery and cataloging network that allows people to review and share their favorite movies, books, games, music, restaurants and beer

Add Bookmark














