Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything
Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common? Why do drug dealers still live with their moms? How much do parents really matter? How did the legalization of abortion affect the rate of violent crime?
These may not sound like typical questions for an econo-mist to ask. But Steven D. Levitt is not a typical economist. He is a much-heralded scholar who studies the riddles of everyday life—from cheating and crime to spo... (show more)
Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool? What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common? Why do drug dealers still live with their moms? How much do parents really matter? How did the legalization of abortion affect the rate of violent crime?
These may not sound like typical questions for an econo-mist to ask. But Steven D. Levitt is not a typical economist. He is a much-heralded scholar who studies the riddles of everyday life—from cheating and crime to sports and child-rearing—and whose conclusions turn conventional wisdom on its head.
Freakonomics is a groundbreaking collaboration between Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, an award-winning author and journalist. They usually begin with a mountain of data and a simple question. Some of these questions concern life-and-death issues; others have an admittedly freakish quality. Thus the new field of study contained in this book: freakonomics.
Through forceful storytelling and wry insight, Levitt and Dubner show that economics is, at root, the study of incentives—how people get what they want, or need, especially when other people want or need the same thing. In Freakonomics, they explore the hidden side of . . . well, everything. The inner workings of a crack gang. The truth about real-estate agents. The myths of campaign finance. The telltale marks of a cheating schoolteacher. The secrets of the Klu Klux Klan.
What unites all these stories is a belief that the modern world, despite a great deal of complexity and downright deceit, is not impenetrable, is not unknowable, and—if the right questions are asked—is even more intriguing than we think. All it takes is a new way of looking.
Freakonomics establishes this unconventional premise: If morality represents how we would like the world to work, then economics represents how it actually does work. It is true that readers of this book will be armed with enough riddles and stories to last a thousand cocktail parties. But Freakonomics can provide more than that. It will literally redefine the way we view the modern world.
Related Media
Photo Gallery
Similar Books
You might like these
Reviews (See all 5,654) Write a reviewfor this
-
The dangers of mistaking corelation with causation in regression analysis! Light, quick read with an important message and entertaining forays into the realms of crack dealing, abortion & crime, real estate, sumo wrestling and other seeming nonsense.
Already read
-
A very interesting quick read, I think similar in some way to Malcolm Gladwell's books (indeed he was one of the authors giving this book a positive blurb on the jacket cover).
For some reason I finished the book feeling a bit empty. I think this is because the idea of linking different ideas and looking for correlation/causation is not an entirely new concept. The idea of thinking out of the box with a fresh approach has been written about before.I will admit that the authors are engaging ... (show more)
A very interesting quick read, I think similar in some way to Malcolm Gladwell's books (indeed he was one of the authors giving this book a positive blurb on the jacket cover).
For some reason I finished the book feeling a bit empty. I think this is because the idea of linking different ideas and looking for correlation/causation is not an entirely new concept. The idea of thinking out of the box with a fresh approach has been written about before.I will admit that the authors are engaging and entertaining in their writing style, which encouraged me to breeze through the book. But there is something slightly smug about them. There's a puff piece from the NY Times Magazine by one of the co-authors about the other before each chapter. It does get a bit self congratulatory...As if to say 'Look at how wonderful we are at what we've thought up, and how wrong your conventional wisdom is.'
The opinion about abortion legalistion leading to lower crime rates is interesting, as well as the swimming pools vs guns figures. The baby names chapter got a bit tedious.. For instance a girl named Madison is likely to come from a socioeconomically better off family than one named Ebony. Oh really? Tell me something I don't know! (show less)
- See all reviews
Conversations
Please log in to join the conversation
-
This book provides a good case of using data analysis to shake common "wisdom". To put it in other words, like it or not, this is yet another example of hard evidence based analysis which may be considered a panacea against 'expert opinions' (especially about parenting!), empty-headed political speeches, etc. Even though the authors are highly criticized for their next book (and I don't think I'll spend time to read Superfreakonomics) I'll sincerely recommend this book to lots of my friends.
PS: No, of course I won't let my child go and play at a house in which the parents have a handgun or a rifle no matter what authors tell about the bigger dangers of swimming pools. :)
Facebook User about 1 month ago -
excellent!
loved it, loved how it showed what economics does, how it works and how it answers questions purely .... something most people cannot take .. you know ... THE TRUTH! Today they want everything all gussied up in tons of drapings ... stuff like this cuts to the chase, whether you LIKE it or not .. its REAL.
Terry Reed 8 months ago -
bad
quality of book = less than .5 stars
Incidentally, effective marketing of book = 5 stars
Those who value your time, don't read this book. Bottom line, It's not weighty, relevant, thought provoking, or interesting. I really really wanted it to be all these things, but alas.
Mark Engle about 1 year ago -
Defamation Suit Won
Chicago Sun Times February 18, 2009 FRANK MAIN Crime Reporter
Freakonomics author Steven Levitt will not have to pay a dime to fellow economist John Lott after a federal appeals court ruled last week that the best-selling book did not defame Lott.
Lott, a former University of Chicago visiting professor, sued Levitt in 2006.
Lott is the author of More Guns, Less Crime, which argues that allowing people to carry concealed weapons reduces crime. Lott claimed Freakonomics defamed him with this passage: "When other scholars have tried to replicate [Lott's] results, they found that right-to-carry laws simply don't bring down crime."
Facebook User 10 months ago
Lists
This book has been added to these lists:
More Stuff
About Us
LivingSocial.com is a social discovery and cataloging network that allows people to review and share their favorite movies, books, games, music, restaurants and beer

Add Bookmark








