This book certainly seems to have caused some ripples. Seems that people despair at its lack of subtlety, that it comes too close to caricaturing ... (show more)
This book certainly seems to have caused some ripples. Seems that people despair at its lack of subtlety, that it comes too close to caricaturing modern India, or that it simply isn't interesting as plots go, or that it's all been done before and better by Rushdie and other writers.
I like the narrative device of letters to the Chinese Premier, it aids the satire and creates some good humour. There's a cockiness to Balram / Ashok Sharma's direct addressing of the Chinese Premier that I like. I admire it and such scorn is no less than most politicians deserve.
Does good satire necessarily have to be subtle? Adiga's pointed comments about China and India aren't meant to be subtle are they? Shouldn't satire be sharp and biting? The picture of India may be dark and morbid, but therein lies the basis for satire. Caricature is not a bad thing either. I think most readers are intelligent enough to sense that the whole picture of India is not being given here and that there are exaggerated stereotypes employed by Adiga - often crucial ingredients to satire. Charles Dickens often lacked subtlety and caricatured social types / figures ceaselessly and he is, without a doubt, one of the finest English writers and satirists.
And as for the believability of the narrative device, I think that criticising it for this is a cheap shot. Does anyone believe, including Balram Halwai, that the Premier will actually get to read Balram's e-mails? Or indeed that there is an e-mail address at which the Premier sits being helplessly inundated with Balram-spam? Doesn't this call for a suspension of disbelief, or at least some imagination about what the Premier's face would look like upon reading the e-mails? The cheek of it tickles me and the contempt of the political classes the world over rings true with this reader.
The fact that other writers have written better things about India is heartening and encourages me to read further about this fascinating country, but I reckon Adiga's first effort has its place. It's an enjoyable read and one that is not without suspense, humour or indeed good writing.
I disagree with any charges that the language is mediocre as well. There is some strong and compelling description in this novel:
"A rich man's body is like a premium cotton pillow, white and soft and blank. Ours are different. My father's spine was a knotted rope, the kind that women use in villages to pull water from the wells; the clavicle curved around his neck in high relief, like a dog's collar; cuts and nicks and scars, like little whip marks in his flesh, ran down his chest and waist, reaching down below his hipbones into his buttocks. The story of a poor man's life is written on his body, in a sharp pen."
The section on the Rooster Coop is also a blistering symbol for the oppression that lies within the caste system.
"Isn't it all wonderful? Isn't it all grand? Aren't you grateful to be my servant?"
Like any country, India has its unpleasant underbelly. I cannot vouch for its accuracy or truthfulness - I've never been to India - but I enjoyed the story and the way in which it was told. And I'm pretty sure that, as with every caricature or stereotype, there is a grain of truth in there somewhere.
Give it a go. (show less)

Add Bookmark












