Intriguing to analyze, albeit tedious and slow to read. Well worth the effort, but remember to keep an open mind and explore other history philoso... (show more)
The Idea of History: With Lectures 1926-1928
The Idea of History is the best-known work of the great Oxford philosopher, historian, and archaeologist R.G. Collingwood. It was originally published posthumously in 1946, having been mainly reconstructed from Collingwood's manuscripts, many of which are now lost. This important work examines
how the idea of history has evolved from the time of Herodotus to the twentieth century, and offers Collingwood's own view of what history is. For this revised edition, Collingwood's most important lec... (show more)
The Idea of History is the best-known work of the great Oxford philosopher, historian, and archaeologist R.G. Collingwood. It was originally published posthumously in 1946, having been mainly reconstructed from Collingwood's manuscripts, many of which are now lost. This important work examines
how the idea of history has evolved from the time of Herodotus to the twentieth century, and offers Collingwood's own view of what history is. For this revised edition, Collingwood's most important lectures on the philosophy of history are published here for the first time. These texts have been
prepared by Jan van der Dussen from manuscripts that have only recently become available. The lectures contain Collingwood's first comprehensive statement of his philosophy of history; they are therefore essential for a full understanding of his thought, and in particular for a correct
interpretation of The Idea of History itself. Van der Dussen contributes a substantial introduction in which he explains the background to this new edition and surveys the scholarship of the last fifty years. (show less)
Related Media
Photo Gallery
Reviews (See all 4) Write a reviewfor this
It's a hit!
No, it's a flop!
Boo-urns. Collingwood is everything I dislike in reading Philosophy. He takes incredibly simple, clear concepts (ex. history is an interpretation o... (show more)
Boo-urns. Collingwood is everything I dislike in reading Philosophy. He takes incredibly simple, clear concepts (ex. history is an interpretation of a historical actor's actions using your imagination) and makes them obtuse and unnecissarily complex. This book was a pain to read, and I gained little out of it. Unless you like rambling overly complex discussions stay away. (show less)
More Reviews
-
-
this great work completely blew my mind when i first read it as an undergraduate
Already read
- See all reviews
Lists
This book has been added to these lists:
More Stuff
About Us
LivingSocial.com is a social discovery and cataloging network that allows people to review and share their favorite movies, books, games, music, restaurants and beer

Add Bookmark


