Lolita
Awe and exhiliration--along with heartbreak and mordant wit--abound in Lolita, Nabokov's most famous and controversial novel, which tells the story of the aging Humbert Humbert's obsessive, devouring, and doomed passion for the nymphet Dolores Haze. Lolita is also the story of a hypercivilized European colliding with the cheerful barbarism of postwar America. Most of all, it is a meditation on love--love as outrage and hallucination, madness and transformation.
Related Media
Photo Gallery
Reviews (See all 4,280) Write a reviewfor this
-
A beautifully written tragic romance. A lyrical, sensitive, darkly moving story, exploring what it means to be a victim of one's own impulses and desires, in which the roles of predator and prey are never as clearly defined as one might expect.
The subject matter - which some might find distasteful - is handled articulately and intelligently, and the writer never resorts to baseness or shock tactics, yet without shying away from the more carnal aspects of the protagonist's relationship wi... (show more)
A beautifully written tragic romance. A lyrical, sensitive, darkly moving story, exploring what it means to be a victim of one's own impulses and desires, in which the roles of predator and prey are never as clearly defined as one might expect.
The subject matter - which some might find distasteful - is handled articulately and intelligently, and the writer never resorts to baseness or shock tactics, yet without shying away from the more carnal aspects of the protagonist's relationship with his nymphet.
The book slips frequently into French, which may make parts of it less accessible for some, but on the whole a compelling, gorgeously-crafted and highly readable story. (show less)
Already read
-
Brilliantly and intricately crafted, profoundly moving, hideous; I haven't been so shocked by my own reaction to a book in a long time.
The first two hundred or so pages of this book made me so angry and sad that my skin actually hurt; I felt bruised and empty every time I picked up the thing to read it. Poor Lo. Every page is chock-full of confirmation of the self-serving, others-oblivious nature of most human love. HH's insanity/self-delusion/self-deception makes his obsession with li... (show more)Brilliantly and intricately crafted, profoundly moving, hideous; I haven't been so shocked by my own reaction to a book in a long time.
The first two hundred or so pages of this book made me so angry and sad that my skin actually hurt; I felt bruised and empty every time I picked up the thing to read it. Poor Lo. Every page is chock-full of confirmation of the self-serving, others-oblivious nature of most human love. HH's insanity/self-delusion/self-deception makes his obsession with little Lolita even more terrifying; rare and short-lived are his moments of second-guessing and remorse. He desperately tries to convince himself that his coercing (rather than flat-out rape) of Lolita removes him from the guilt of abuse, that her (however hesitant) acquiescence absolves him of wrongdoing.
Lo is forced to grow up in an atmosphere of lecherous manipulation, and by the time she is fourteen years old, coldly selling her body in exchange for gifts has become her only consistent ritual, habit, normality. HH himself is oblivious to everything except his own obsession. He calls it love, and yet the object of his love lays in bed weeping every night of their initial road-trip; he makes the object of his "love" give him a hand job while she's sitting in her classroom at school, in the presence of all her (thankfully ignorant) classmates, and while he's watching another girl; every single day, HH confirms to Lolita that she is nothing but an object, a body, and that human love is nothing more than a self-satisfying lust.
He is the single most repulsive character that I've ever met, but he's not entirely to blame for the tragedy. Lo's mother commits suicide (at least this is implied) by throwing herself in front of a car, fully aware of the danger her daughter is in from a predatory older man; she gives in to her own pain at HH's rejection instead of being strong enough, loving her daughter enough, to swallow that pain and protect her. She threatens HH, telling him that he'll never see Lo again, but the threat is only aimed at hurting him and has nothing whatsoever to do with removing her daughter from a dangerous situation; her own drama and her broken heart are more important to her than Lo's safety, and by killing herself she voluntarily places a little girl in a completely vulnerable position.
And yes, Lolita does initially flirt with HH--she is a little girl, little girls are natural flirts; she had also already begun to experiment sexually before she even met him. But the height of HH's disgusting selfishness is the fact that he, with all his grown-up experience, responds to her actions as if she is as experienced as he is, never even considering (or else knowing and not caring) the psychological trauma and the developmental nightmares he is inflicting upon the unprotected child.
As I read, my heart ached for little Lo, and every page jerked and twisted my insides; I almost vomited twice, and it took a lot of willpower to keep reading.
The last fifty pages of the book left me nearly in tears; I actually pitied HH: his insanity and most of all his humanity; I became aware of exactly how much of his sense of right he had repressed in order to continue his relationship with Lo; chapter 32 was the turning point, when he allowed himself to dwell on the full extent of the damage he had inflicted on her. The best passage of the book is this, "I happened to glimpse from the bathroom, through a chance combination of mirror aslant and door ajar, a look on her face... that look I cannot exactly describe... and expression of helplessness so perfect that it seemed to grade into one of rather comfortable inanity just because this was the very limit of injustice and frustration--and every limit presupposes something beyond it--hence the neutral illumination."
And this, "But the awful point of the whole argument is this. It had become gradually clear to my conventional Lolita during our singular and bestial cohabitation that even the most miserable of family lives was better than the parody of incest, which, in the long run, was the best I could offer the waif."
He remembers the times when fleeting thoughts of abandoning his abusive behavior towards Lo were overcome, within seconds, by lust, and his momentary feelings of remorse vanished as he performed once again the actions that caused those feelings in the first place; and he is disgusted by himself. "I loved you. I was a pentapod monster, but I loved you. I was despicable and brutal, and turpid, and everything, mais je t'aimais, je t'aimais!"
He murders the man that "stole" Lolita from him, charges him with sodomizing her; it's almost like watching him kill himself, symbolically destroying another man for the same sins he hates himself for committing. And then he immortalizes the object of his love in literature, as so many other poets have done.
Lolita is beautifully written and is a powerful reminder of the human capacity for ego-centricity and self-deception, of the destructive and maddening nature of a selfish romantic love. The tragedy of the story lies in the fact that he was not just a lecherous old man: he actually and deeply loved Lolita. Even when she no longer looks anything like the little "nymphet" that originally sparked his lust, he still loves her and desperately wants to live the rest of his life with her; the flawed nature of his love for her, unfortunately, had already killed the possibility of her ever seeing him as anything but a pervert. Selfishness kills love, and people are filled to the brim with both. HH's brand of love is a mockery--it devours and destroys its objects--it is a black hole that can never be satisfied--it is self-pitying and never looks outside of itself--it is pathetic, a pitiful sham, and it is all that many people will ever experience."He broke my heart. You merely broke my life." (show less)
Already read
- See all reviews
Conversations
Please log in to join the conversation
-
Wow. What does one say about Lolita? I read it. Beautiful language--Nabokov is a master. There are dozens of sentences that will take your breath away. Regardless, hard subject matter. There are times where you want to throw it across the room in disgust. Parts of the story drag. But it's worth reading... it's an important book, an interesting look at humanity's darker side, a desperately sad tale.
Facebook-användare 19 days ago -
The book started out great, but started to drag towards the middle. I wanted to love it, and perhaps that's why I felt a little let down by "Lolita." I enjoyed the word play, but for some reason it was a real struggle for me to finish this book.
Facebook-användare 29 days ago -
Initially I liked Humbert, something about his intellect and depravity were lustily attractive in a gray and happy world of protagonists. "Lolita" tantalizes me because it is not crude, it elegantly and humorously depicts the spirally madness of a withered mind.
Facebook-användare about 1 month ago -
I initially didn't like Humbert when I started reading. Despite his intelligence, he was undoublty self-centered, manipulative and selfish man. For the crimes he did, he justifys them; for the loath he had, he justifys them. The abuse of his first wife, the manipulation of his second wife and the road trip with Dolores Haze: All suggested his lack respect for women. Nevertheless, somehow, he became his own greatest demise when he lost Dolores Haze to another pedophile like himself. All this while, he had developed feelings for her that turned out to be love rather than lust for nymphets. When he finally found her who wasn't much of a nymphet anymore, he asked her to be by his side again but she refused; the years of abuse had done too much damage in her life that she could not return to him. As he grieved at the lost of his love, he took revenge on Cue for taking her away. At the same time, to kill the mirror image he was disgusted about. As if he wanted to atone for his sins, he wrote his autobiography to immotalise his love for her and his well wishes to her and telling her to cherish Dick. In the end, despite not agreeing with what he did and that Dolores wasn't really exactly innocent, I could not help but to sympathise with them both.
Facebook-användare about 1 month ago -
There something very tricky in this book. I'm mix feelings about it because I'm disgusted by Humbert in some aspects of his behaviour towards Lolita but at the same time you can feel in the writing of Nabokov the tragedy going on. I admire the play on words with the name Humbert with all its variations ! It's a tough book but on the other hand, you feel "achieved" when you finish that book !
Gigi British 2 months ago -
I loved how lyrical this book was! The first chapter grabs you and makes you feel the passion that Humbert feels for Lolita. And although it is a twisted relationship and he is sick for doing what he does, you can't help but feel some compassion for him. It takes you completely into his perspective and his justifications. I almost felt a little sorry for him...as well as for Lolita, obviously, even though i thought she was a bit of a brat at points. She definitely acquired more than a fair share of issues for a girl so young and innocent.
Danielle Louie 2 months ago -
-
It can be a most uncomfortable read (especially the first half). The beginning gave mixed feelings, as Nabokov describes a little girl in very sensual erotic language. Read Nabokov's reasons for writing this book (it can be found in several novels at the back of the book) this can put it into context. It demonstrates his intent which should not be missed while reading this book.
Facebook-användare 2 months ago -
I had a professor once say that this book was not worth the attention to speak of. We were all naming books we read recently, and that was mine. He was then examining it from an ideological perspective (the course was literature and ideology). I couldn't believe how quickly he dismissed it, based most likely on stereotypes and poor reading/assumptions. Read "Reading Lolita in Tehran," which first introduced me to "Lolita." That puts the book in quite a different context than my stuffy prof!
Facebook-användare 2 months ago -
Moral of the story?
How can people call this a lovestory? Isn't love about caring about other people and thinking about their good as much as your owns? How did the main character of Lolita think about Lolitas' best? He used her to his own intensions and that's it. That is not love. That is selfish and cruel.
Hanna Jäkälä about 1 year ago
Lists
This book has been added to these lists:
More Stuff
About Us
LivingSocial.com is a social discovery and cataloging network that allows people to review and share their favorite movies, books, games, music, restaurants and beer

Lägg till bokmärke







